Rated: 3.5 / 5
About the Film and Its Accuracy
I wonder how many films have been made that actually cover the topic of child sex-trafficking? There’s Rambo: Last Blood, but there wasn’t really trafficking in that film, and that wasn’t the main focus. The Man From Nowhere (aka Uncle) didn’t cover that topic at all, and was more about selling children’s organs on the black market. Taken (2008) was about a father rescuing his daughter from sex traffickers, but that had a very narrow range on the subject matter. I did a little digging to see what film in the past have been done that tackle this subject matter. I did find a few (none of which I have seen… yet):
- Sex Traffic (2004)
- The Jammed (2007)
- The Whistleblower (2010)
- Eden (2012)
To a lesser extent, there’s also a miniseries titled Three Girls (2017) which, as far as I can tell, doesn’t have any trafficking per-se, and it’s its own thing. Plus the complimentary film Gardens of the Night (2008) which deals with how a couple of these abused children carry on with life while suffering from the after-effects of the trauma.
So what is it that Sound of Freedom does different than those films that made it go through enough flack and resistance to prevent its release for 5 years (that’s right, this film was completed in 2018)? There’s the fact that this film was originally made under the 20th Century Fox company, which became purchased by Disney (which is a kike-run pedo-headquarters these days next to Nickelodeon) in that year, and they shelved the film until they released/sold the rights to it, but then COVID hit in 2020[3]. All that aside, this is a film that’s actually based on true events, as the end credits will certainly remind the viewers.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PAuSO9XYATMj
But I did have to take a look into how accurate the events portrayed in the film are. It certainly wasn’t hard to find articles that called bullshit on some of it (as linked by Wikipedia). Vice, for instance, has 2 articles that are critical of Tim Ballard (played by Jim Caviezal in the film) and the Operation Underground Railroad (OUR) charity (in fact, Vice has several articles that are critical of OUR). But it’s not exactly giving me faith in their grounds for criticisms when their article states that elites abducting and sexually enslaving children are just “false conspiracy theories[1].” I mean, for fuck’s sake, Epstein was arrested and killed prior to when that Vice article was written; that controversy alone should be enough to persuade anyone with common sense to know elites are around who partake in the sex trade. Vice’s criticisms boil down to OUR being too vague about what it does (or is currently doing), and being caught exaggerating their involvement in various cases. But, I mean, considering how high up this goes, and what we’ve seen undercover operatives have to do to nab their targets in stuff that’s unrelated to child-sex-trafficking (drug trades, mafias, among other things), I can see why there’s a need for secrecy. On the other hand, it is possible there’s some corruption in OUR, but it’s primarily speculation that I’m seeing being thrown on them at this point.
I did find this point their bring up rather… amusing:
Because many anti-trafficking organizations have specifically Christian, often evangelical, ties, and resist the idea that there’s such a thing as voluntary sex work, their members and some of the people supposedly being saved may not see things the same way.[1]
You know… it’s not like sex work, even if voluntary, is a healthy thing that people, especially kids, should be involved in. The organizations/corporations making accusations against OUR seem to have their own skeletons in the closet, whether the accusations are founded or unfounded.
Anyway, there’s another source that’s more practical in its criticism of Tim Ballard and OUR, American Crime Journal[2]. Basically shows that Ballard over-exaggerated his involvement with rescuing the girl depicted in the film.
Regardless of all that, regardless of the accuracies and lack thereof in the film , regardless of the effectiveness and sincerity of the OUR, I think we can all agree that child sex trafficking is a wicked deplorable thing that destroys the innocence of children. And we’re living in a time where, as if in response to the awareness of child sex trafficking, child sexualization is becoming normalized and encouraged. This is because they (you know) want it normalized because they know how profitable it is. Plus there’s that whole thing regarding the torturing and killing of children to get their blood because it’s the most highly valued plasma in the elitest world (adrenochrome). Probably one of the reasons why Mel Gibson is helping out with uncovering the child sex trafficking going on in Ukraine[4].
Review
All that aside, what did I think about the film itself? It’s well-made. Quite good and well-paced, for the most part. Jim Caviezel brings his A-game to the acting department to make those teary-eyed moments work, though it almost threatens to be too much as far as quantity of those moments goes. As far as pacing goes, it was ok for a while, threatened to get too slow; but then the “let’s make a sex shop front” plot comes into play, and it gets interesting again. After that major bust halfway through the film, that’s when the movie started to feel overlong. It had a finale, now it wanted to continue on and have another one. But all in all, it’s not bad.
And for once in a long LONG time in film history, holy shit, we have a protagonist with a family (of 7 kids plus a wife), where there isn’t any domestic problems, and a wife who is fully understanding and very supportive of the work her husband does. Talk about a big giant fucking breath of fresh air to see that in a movie with a white family.
There were a couple of moments where the film came off as preachy, but that’s forgivable given what’s going on. The main highlight for me was when… uh…
*looks up name*
… Vampiro talks about his experience with having sex with a girl who turned out to be underage. How he got a look into her soul, and how he saw that she viewed him as just another man who was part of the problem with the world that contributes to her sadness and her current situation. That was a strong moment. About as strong as this epilogue text at the end stating that children who are current victims of child-sex-trafficking are basically the equivalent to slaves (who are getting it worse than actual slaves in America prior to emancipation), and there are more child slaves then there were slaves in America prior to the 1900s. Nice way to attempt a guilt trip on those reparation-mongering assholes (with some logic, nevermind the white slavery issue).
So yeah, I can recommend this film. It’s likely to get you emotional at times (I had to fight back a tear or two a few times). There isn’t anything graphic in the movie, just in case you’re wondering.
Spoiler note: I thought they were going to do something interesting with that GPS syringe, like injecting it into the child so she could run away and get picked up later. They didn’t do that, which makes me wish they just injected it into themselves from the start if they weren’t going to utilize that potential. Oh well.
On Pedophilia… Again (hopefully for the last time)
Now I know some people who have read my first and second blog articles on the subject are going to try and go off on me here for an apparent double standard, or even an apparent walkback, on my prior position on the subject. This is likely my fault, as I’m not the best at making my position all that clear-cut. That, and I initially made those articles to evoke a reaction that I could bounce off of and make another article out of with back and forth arguments/debates/dialects (which I basically did in the second blog). I think it’s time I try to make myself clear here on my position regarding pedophilia.
First of all, when it comes to pornography, I understand the slippery slope that entails. How one who watches it can start off viewing just sex in general and get aroused by it; only to want the ages being depicted lowered overtime. Because it’s about the loss of innocence. A part of you that is innocent will be lost once you start getting into porn. So then you start to get off on seeing actual innocence being exploited, or at least something closer to it. Eventually some slide down that slope far enough to where they start getting into actual child porn. I’m not talking lolicons in a hentai, I’m talking about the real deal. If it’s not something they (always) find repulsive upon viewing, that’s going to be a problem.
For me, the whole point of pornography is getting off on seeing other people enjoying themselves sexually. If they’re not enjoying themselves and each other, then I can’t get off on it. Rape videos that aren’t actual rape videos don’t apply, because roleplay is something else entirely. Actual rape though, just like actual predators acting upon actual children, that’s not something I’ll ever enjoy, and something I’ll always be against.
That being said, pornography isn’t healthy either, anymore than alcohol is. Just as too much alcohol can lead to brain damage, too much pornography can rewire the brain into something just as unpleasant[6]. It’s not something you should be hooked on, anymore than social media with its dopamine addiction[7]. And that’s not taking into account the mental damage caused by child abuse and drugs/hormones for sex-change, or how a child who has been sexually abused has a likelihood of growing up to become a child-abuser themselves (look at R. Kelly). The point being, all of those factors can encourage degeneracy that contributes not just towards a desire to want sexual contact with a child, but also a lack of self-control that would restrain one from doing so, and thus discarding common sense and moral decency, or what kind of chemicals are being put into our food and water that also act as contributing factors.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u2f6SL3gdFHp
The use of social media for long durations shouldn’t be normalized. Daily consumption of alcohol shouldn’t be normalized. And pedophilia shouldn’t be normalized. Child predators should be shot. And there’s a distinction to be made between a pedophile and a child predator (anyone who plays a part in child-sex-trafficking should be considered a child predator).
The problem is with society as it currently stands. Social media in of itself, aside from the malicious intentions of those who run the website, isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It is one’s responsibility to use social media responsibly, and not too frequently and for too long. Alcohol in of itself isn’t bad (otherwise the brewers from early America all the way back to medieval Europe have some explaining to do, let alone ancient times), the irresponsible drinking of it is (and of certain brands that just aren’t good quality). And yes, pedophilia isn’t necessarily a bad thing either, though it’s rarely a good thing; it’s particularly a bad thing if one acts on that desire without having any mental brakes (ie empathy, impulse control, logic, etc). That last bit is a rather controversial position to take, and I’ve already gone over it plenty in prior posts. While I do believe there are situations where one at or above the age of consent can morally be with one under the age of consent (as currently defined by most U.S. state laws), these are exceptions to what should be standard and excepted, not the rule itself. Pedophilia is not something that should be actively encouraged, if for no other reason (and there are other reasons) than it being unlikely that both individuals can be capable of being responsible parents, let alone willing to start a family with each other. That, and children should be entitled to having a childhood, which is something they can’t really have if they willingly or unwillingly get involved in sexual relationships; it shatters their innocence and alters their development because most can’t handle that in a healthy way (hence why a level of maturity is required; some mature at different rates than others). What makes it exceptional depends on several factors that I’ve covered in the earlier posts. But allow me to make the case again in another way.
Like I said, society as it is today is the problem. We’ve gone from prohibiting any and all acts of pedophilia (at least since the early 1900s to the 2000s), to seemingly actively encouraging it at least as far as the mainstream is concerned. It hasn’t quite reached blatant encouragement yet, but the slippery slope is certainly getting us there. The problem is that the encouragement of LGBT and sex-change operations (which in of itself is a moneymaking racket[8] just as child-sex-trafficking is, and abortion, and illegal alien workers) does harm to society, particularly white society. Why? Because you can’t produce families (at least not healthy ones, in spite of what very few gay adoption success stories may claim) from a couple who aren’t of the opposite sex and of relatively the same age. Though on that last note, I say this with the knowledge that women become exponentially more likely to produce offspring with a mental (if not physical) defect once they reach the age of 30, and the likelihood of a defect goes up exponentially more with each year after that (not to mention decline in fertility). As for men, well, they should have kids at a young enough age to where they can keep up with them physically throughout their youth, up through their children reaching the age of 20, give or take a couple years. In other words, men should start having kids prior to the age of 40. There are exceptions, of course, and some can make things work outside of those limits, but that’s my general understanding.
The whole point of sex is to make children and raise a family (with enjoyment in the process of making said children). You just need to make sure you’re with someone who is capable and responsible enough to do so (and is likely attractive enough for you to want to, on the outside and inside). For instance, medieval England (and other nations) had the age of consent at 12, or 13, or 14, depending on which century you’re looking at (I go into other countries in a prior post). It was more of a wait until they’re capable of understanding what it means/entails, able to be responsible, and capable of raising and supporting a family (possibly with some assistance early on). It was assumed the elder person would know when the child is mature enough, and it would normally be around that listed age of consent at the youngest. You know, teaching responsibility and ensuring it being an established virtue for everyone.
The problem is that society today promotes irresponsibility and irresponsible actions. Because it’s easy to profit off of those who are irresponsible. It is easy to manipulate and control those who are irresponsible. It is easy to run child-sex-trafficking operations, and act as child predators, in an irresponsible society. It is easy to destroy a society incapable of making functional family units, let alone communities. How can anyone expect otherwise when virginity is something viewed less as something to be cherished and more as something to be shed as soon as possible? How can anyone expect a healthy society when deviants who are incapable of providing actual love for a child are praised for wanting to commit sexual acts just for the sake of satiating their lust? How can a healthy (white) society exists when it discourages a healthy (white) family unit from existing? There is a big gap between lust and love; they are not necessarily complimentary.
Unfortunately, we don’t live in a time when politicians meant to represent and uphold white wellbeing exist, at least not within the current major political parties. The only hope outside of a major revolt and bloody coups (which may only make things worse) is putting support behind an alternative party that can, at the very least, kick the deviancy back into the darkness where it belongs. It may not result in my desired ideal society where we can promote responsibility among children at a young age (between 14 and 20) so they can be more mature and intelligent and capable than the average youth of today, even going so far as to be prepared for making their own families; but I’d rather take a more strict society that restricts age of consent to 18 and up (or even 21 and up) over what is being promoted today.
So I’m ending this by saying I’m going to put my support being the National Justice Party (NJP), and hope my trust won’t be misplaced as it has been with others in the past. If Democrats are too corrupted to the core to where they’ll actively promote rampant unchecked pedophilia, and if Republicans are too cowardly and compromised to bring balance, and if the deep state is too entrenched in both, then this is the best bet as far as I can tell. Among other things, the NJP can offer hope. May they deliver it if they start to gain ground and power and influence. Sorry to get political, but we’re living in times where it’s an unavoidable duty lest things get that much worse. Kidnapped children need groups like OUR for salvation. A corrupted and decaying nation needs a political group like NJP to heal it and make it healthy again. Things like child-sex-trafficking are only possible in corrupted nations.
Sources
[1] Merlan, Anna. “A Famed Anti-Sex Trafficking Group Has a Problem With the Truth.” Vice. 10 December 2020. Accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7a3qw/a-famed-anti-sex-trafficking-group-has-a-problem-with-the-truth
[2] Moore, Damion. “The Arrest of Earl Venton Buchanan.” American Crime Journal. 5 September 2022. Accessed 7 July 2023. https://americancrimejournal.com/the-arrest-of-earl-venton-buchanan/
[3] Hamilton, Heather. “Sound of Freedom film highlights child trafficking crisis: ‘God’s children are not for sale.’” Washington Examiner. 12 May 2023. Accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sound-of-freedom-film-highlights-child-trafficking-crisis
[4] Smith, Ryan. “Mel Gibson Provided ‘Valuable Intelligence’ on Child Trafficking for Doc.” Newsweek. 23 June 2023. Accessed 7 July, 2023. https://www.newsweek.com/mel-gibson-provided-valuable-intelligence-child-trafficking-docuseries-1805492
[5] Coulter, Christina. “Three Disney theme park employees are among 17 arrested in Florida child sex sting after they set up meetings with undercover detectives posing as 13- and 14-year-olds online.” Daily Mail. 4 August 2021. Accessed 4 July 2023. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9861403/Three-Disney-theme-park-employees-17-people-arrested-child-sex-sting-Florida.html
[6] “Watching pornography rewires the brain to a more juvenile state.” Neuroscience News. 29 December 2019. Accessed 4 July 2023. https://neurosciencenews.com/neuroscience-pornography-brain-15354/
[7] Miller, Sarah. “The Addictiveness of Social Media: How Teens Get Hooked.” Jefferson Health. 2 June 2022. Accessed 4 July 2023. https://www.jeffersonhealth.org/your-health/living-well/the-addictiveness-of-social-media-how-teens-get-hooked
[8] Howard, Scott. The Transgender-Industrial Complex. Antelope Hill Publishing, 2020.
Edit (4-21-2024): Well, that NJP thing didn’t work out. They basically self-destructed. Oh well… here’s to the next earnest effort. And I know, I’m very late in acknowledging this.
The Anomalous Host 